Sorry to hear that news . I am traveling in Europe for a few days but will attend to this when I get back. Andy .

#JT65

Ken wa3fkg died November of 2015. Please release him from your group. His wife Linda Sent from my Kindle Fire Life without God is like an un-sharpened pencil. It has no point. The app said Windows 7 o

#JT65

Tnx Ev, Will have a look at that , could try that , set up fldigi in beacon mode , not used psk on 5 for a long time . though I must admit, psk might not give a true indication of local , short distan

#JT65

Graham, If you're interested in a group of folks that use PSK31 as a propagation indicator...and may even be interested in giving 60 meters a try...visit http://www.PropNET.org If you formatted your T

#JT65

Andy, An interesting exchange between k6qi and the fcc a while back over the emissions allowable on the , then new, 5 meg band, ending in simplicity , with the FCC pointing out that the band was under

#JT65

Thanks for the welcome. ARRL needs to get more involved in the "gentlemen agreement" on the band plans. It will be interesting to see how this plays out. 73, KI4VMK

#JT65

Welcome . The 60m situation is Indeed a mess. This group was at a major factor in gathering evidence to overcome the ARRL’s earlier claim that only PSK31 and PACTOR were allowed on 60m. It is time the

#JT65

I'm new to the group and was looking through these hashtags. I like the 60 meter band and would like to see it expanded and more oversight by the ARRL. 73, KI4VMK

#JT65

Looks like Joe has made a release candidate for WSJT-X v1.8 which includes the new FT8 mode. https://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/wsjtx.html Binaries for Windows, Linux & Mac. 73 Sholto K7TMG

#JT65 #WSJTX

Andy, That's quite so, but there is also ,as to exactly what is being compared , psk is free running live qso mode , where the JT system's are beacon , fixed format , psk is susceptible to path phase

#PSK31 #JT65

FYI, 67 DXCC entities picked up by my Inverted V over the past couple of days, ALL continents. I wonder where the usual limit is for a station in the eastern part of USA, 80 DXXC regularly active ? Mo

#JT65

Hello Andy, I reread your idiots, sorry, old codger guide v1.1. Still informative. I noticed the section on bolshevik prevention about 'Id after 73' as in 'R TU VA 73'. I wonder how many do not do tha

#JT65 #Software

Robert, Try Dimension4 or BT time sync by I think IZ2BTK, both free and work great. I sync with WWV over the web Good luck 73 de Ron W4LDE Sent from my iPhone

#JT65 #Software

What is the best link to set time at. Robert-WA6MBL Sent from my iPad

#JT65 #Software

I wrote this quick guide , http://obriensweb.com/wsjtx.html , when WSJTX was new (as opposed to my guide for plain WSJT ) . I still receive thank you notes about the guide but it is surely way out of

#JT65 #Software

That just brings up the issue of equipment frequency accuracy. Not everyone has even 100 hz accuracy which is about the range one can copy an off frequency USB voice. . . And the limit for out of band

#JT65

By digitalradio Left my receiver on 80M JT65 frequency for past 24 hours...Longest distance... HL3OPC 80m JT65 10838 km 04:01:51 LU4XAP 80m JT65 10502 km 03:49:50 RK6C 80m JT65 8596 km 05:30:51 CE3WW

#JT65

Jim, Thanks for the references. Indeed you are correct, the FCC said "may". However, the first sentence is more restrictive I believe, stating that stations "may transmit ONLY on the five CENTER frequ

#JT65

The FCC comments back in 2012 on the following link: https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2012-2477/p-27 It says "may" and not "shall" and there is a difference between "carrier" (set to 1.5khz below fre

#JT65

I'm not suggesting that I dislike the practice , I'm suggesting that it is time to give up on the idea if everyone is establishing a more reasonable approach Sent from my iPhone

#JT65