|
k3ukpage
By digitalradio
ANNOUNCE: NEW G3NRW IC-7300 RESOURCES PAGE
I have pleasure in announcing the new IC-7300 Resources Page,
By digitalradio
ANNOUNCE: NEW G3NRW IC-7300 RESOURCES PAGE
I have pleasure in announcing the new IC-7300 Resources Page,
|
By
main@digitalradio.groups.io Integration <main@...>
·
#50180
·
|
|
ANNOUNCE: NEW G3NRW IC-7300 RESOURCES PAGE
ANNOUNCE: NEW G3NRW IC-7300 RESOURCES PAGE
--
73
Ian, G3NRW
g3nrw@...
***** Editor, IC-7300 Resources Page: http://g3nrw.net/IC-7300
ANNOUNCE: NEW G3NRW IC-7300 RESOURCES PAGE
--
73
Ian, G3NRW
g3nrw@...
***** Editor, IC-7300 Resources Page: http://g3nrw.net/IC-7300
|
By
Ian_Wade_G3NRW <g3nrw-radio@...>
·
#50179
·
|
|
Re: Take over this group?
Sorry to see you go Andy. You have done a good job.
Best
Kim W4OSS
Sorry to see you go Andy. You have done a good job.
Best
Kim W4OSS
|
By
kim campbell <swamprabbit1951@...>
·
#50178
·
|
|
Dragon SCS modem ?
#Pactor
Anyone have a Dragon SCS modem for sale ? It is really the only digital mode I have not tried and , despite knowing there is little activity other that Winlink stuff, I am interested in experimenting
Anyone have a Dragon SCS modem for sale ? It is really the only digital mode I have not tried and , despite knowing there is little activity other that Winlink stuff, I am interested in experimenting
|
By
Andrew O'Brien
·
#50177
·
|
|
Take over this group?
As you can probably tell, I have essentially lost interest in this group mail list. If anyone wants to take over as "owner", let me know
Andy K3UK
As you can probably tell, I have essentially lost interest in this group mail list. If anyone wants to take over as "owner", let me know
Andy K3UK
|
By
Andrew O'Brien
·
#50176
·
|
|
xGxRxIxDxX Exercise Info - 11/15/17
Shares net very busy at this time, with more activity planned this evening. This might be standard, but some importance seemed to being imparted to not miss it. Much of net controls info was also in
Shares net very busy at this time, with more activity planned this evening. This might be standard, but some importance seemed to being imparted to not miss it. Much of net controls info was also in
|
By
WD8ARZ
·
#50175
·
|
|
TS-590 Family Resources Page: November 2017 Update
TS-590 Family Resources Page: November 2017 Update
*The TS-590 Family Resources Page …………….. g3nrw.net/TS-590*
*New this month*
Two new items this month:
*
TS-590 Family Resources Page: November 2017 Update
*The TS-590 Family Resources Page …………….. g3nrw.net/TS-590*
*New this month*
Two new items this month:
*
|
By
Ian_Wade_G3NRW <g3nrw-radio@...>
·
#50174
·
|
|
Re: Packet rates HF/VHF/UHF under part-97
That CW / Process Gain test for Part-15 products seems like a joke now but it was symptomatic of the excessive regulation that the FCC used to indulge in.
Fortunately the FCC under Ajit Pai is now
That CW / Process Gain test for Part-15 products seems like a joke now but it was symptomatic of the excessive regulation that the FCC used to indulge in.
Fortunately the FCC under Ajit Pai is now
|
By
M5AKA
·
#50173
·
|
|
Re: Packet rates HF/VHF/UHF under part-97
I spotted your post a while ago Trevor, but looking around since, its difficult to concur , not that it's a laudable concept , where it not for the time and effort that has been expended,
I spotted your post a while ago Trevor, but looking around since, its difficult to concur , not that it's a laudable concept , where it not for the time and effort that has been expended,
|
By
Graham
·
#50172
·
|
|
[TS-590S] TS-590 Family Resources Page: October 2017 Update
TS-590 Family Resources Page: October 2017 Update
LATEST NEWS
*New this month*
Several people, including myself, have experienced issues
lately with device drivers
TS-590 Family Resources Page: October 2017 Update
LATEST NEWS
*New this month*
Several people, including myself, have experienced issues
lately with device drivers
|
By
Ian_Wade_G3NRW <g3nrw-radio@...>
·
#50171
·
|
|
Re: Packet rates HF/VHF/UHF under part-97
Yes existing VHF/UHF rigs lock you into one modulation type for 9600 bps. Maybe in coming years we'll see some fully programmable SDR transceivers for those bands.
Also on the horizon will be the
Yes existing VHF/UHF rigs lock you into one modulation type for 9600 bps. Maybe in coming years we'll see some fully programmable SDR transceivers for those bands.
Also on the horizon will be the
|
By
M5AKA
·
#50170
·
|
|
Re: Packet rates HF/VHF/UHF under part-97
Hi Trevor ,
It's Lucky that's a clarification of the regulations , one could be slightly confused by a more in-depth version .
At the moment , the packet fact finding , has been confounded
Hi Trevor ,
It's Lucky that's a clarification of the regulations , one could be slightly confused by a more in-depth version .
At the moment , the packet fact finding , has been confounded
|
By
Graham
·
#50169
·
|
|
Re: New VARA OFDM adaptive HF modem
VARA Modem, new gateway stations , joined the tests , check the 'Public Gateways' list from the application , for the latest station/frequency
NB- Frequency is listed in the Dial Set USB
VARA Modem, new gateway stations , joined the tests , check the 'Public Gateways' list from the application , for the latest station/frequency
NB- Frequency is listed in the Dial Set USB
|
By
Graham
·
#50168
·
|
|
Re: Packet rates HF/VHF/UHF under part-97
Graham, Just run across this useful summary of US Regs regarding Digital Modes
http://www.qsl.net/kb9mwr/projects/wireless/clarify.html
73 Trevor M5AKA
Graham, Just run across this useful summary of US Regs regarding Digital Modes
http://www.qsl.net/kb9mwr/projects/wireless/clarify.html
73 Trevor M5AKA
|
By
M5AKA
·
#50167
·
|
|
Re: "mchf on steroids"
https://www.amateurfunk-sulingen.de/forum/index.php?board=18
this is discussion forum for the ovi40 sdr
(if you wanna know2 more look there or drop a line if you wanna become a member
https://www.amateurfunk-sulingen.de/forum/index.php?board=18
this is discussion forum for the ovi40 sdr
(if you wanna know2 more look there or drop a line if you wanna become a member
|
By
Siegfried Jackstien
·
#50166
·
|
|
Re: SDR QRP Transceiver with built-in FreeDV
Patrick:
I agree -- David Rowe has done a wonderful job given the 1.2 kHz bandwidth. It may sound a bit 'robotic' and decoding can sometimes be susceptible to audio artifacts if
Patrick:
I agree -- David Rowe has done a wonderful job given the 1.2 kHz bandwidth. It may sound a bit 'robotic' and decoding can sometimes be susceptible to audio artifacts if
|
By
Tony
·
#50165
·
|
|
Re: SDR QRP Transceiver with built-in FreeDV
Sigi:
Glad you made the suggestion. I've used the FreeDV waveform in the Flex 6300 as well so that makes 2 rigs that have this option. It will be interesting to see if other
Sigi:
Glad you made the suggestion. I've used the FreeDV waveform in the Flex 6300 as well so that makes 2 rigs that have this option. It will be interesting to see if other
|
By
Tony
·
#50164
·
|
|
"mchf on steroids"
Siegfried or others ... where might we learn more about this "mchf on steroids"? Also, being able to do QRP is attractive to me.
Nick
N1KMP
----------------------- Siegfried Jackstien wrote on
Siegfried or others ... where might we learn more about this "mchf on steroids"? Also, being able to do QRP is attractive to me.
Nick
N1KMP
----------------------- Siegfried Jackstien wrote on
|
By
NKemp
·
#50163
·
|
|
Re: Packet rates HF/VHF/UHF under part-97
Ok Trevor
I was using baud in the context of channel transfer rate , hence the 2.4k and ofdm qualifier
But, by what ever means ... that's the information I was looking for !
Tnx-G,
Ok Trevor
I was using baud in the context of channel transfer rate , hence the 2.4k and ofdm qualifier
But, by what ever means ... that's the information I was looking for !
Tnx-G,
|
By
Graham
·
#50162
·
|
|
Re: Packet rates HF/VHF/UHF under part-97
Graham wrote "So , packet at say, 1200 bauds in 2.4 KHz ssb channel , using , ofdm would be acceptable over a HF link"
No, 1200 baud is not permitted in USA on frequencies below 28 MHz,
Graham wrote "So , packet at say, 1200 bauds in 2.4 KHz ssb channel , using , ofdm would be acceptable over a HF link"
No, 1200 baud is not permitted in USA on frequencies below 28 MHz,
|
By
M5AKA
·
#50161
·
|